Thursday, 19 March 2015

The Soft drink-Cancer Connection - MensJournal.com

The Soda-Cancer Connection - MensJournal.com



The New Dangers of Drinking Soda
Credit: Chris Stein / Getty Images
Drinking Diet Coke, Dr. Pepper, or any dark-colored soda may raise your cancer risk, according to a new report from Johns Hopkins This new analysis follows up a study done by the same researchers last year for which they purchased 110 cans of soda from stores in New York and California and tested them all for 4-MEI. They detected a huge range in 4-MEI levels, from 3.4 micrograms up to 352.5 micrograms per 12-ounce can.
What do those numbers mean in terms of cancer risk? While the federal government has not set a limit for how much 4-MEI may be carcinogenic, the state of California has. Under California law, a product is required to carry a cancer warning if it exposes consumers to 29 micrograms of 4-MEI. So, given that the Johns Hopkins team found levels up to 352.5 micrograms in some sodas, you can see why this is a potentially dangerous health problem.
But here's the really interesting part: According to lead researcher Keeve Nachman, the sodas bought in California tended to have markedly lower levels of 4-MEI than those purchased in New York, where there is no law limiting 4-MEI. His team even saw this trend when comparing cans of the exact same brand and product purchased in the two different states. "It appears that soda manufacturers are using a different type of caramel color that has less 4-MEI in the beverages they sell in California," Nachman says.
The issue for consumers is that even though there are different types of caramel color — some of which do not contain 4-MEI — there is no way of knowing what kind is being used in a beverage or food product. Unlike in Europe, where the particular type of caramel color must be specified on a label, U.S. manufacturers are only required to list caramel color.
"The real issue with this ingredient is its 'often unknown' composition,"  says Kantha Shelke, a food scientist and principal at food science and research firm Corvus Blue. "The large amount of caramel color that's consumed is also problematic, since it is the single-most widely used food coloring in the world. But I'd say the biggest issue for consumers is the lack of transparency around it."

Unfortunately, assessing the actual darkness of a soda won't even tell you which type of caramel color was used. "Dark color is not a dead ringer for high levels of 4-MEI," Nachman says. Some very dark drinks his team tested had low levels, while lighter-hued beverages had higher amounts.

It should be noted that the potential cancer risks associated with 4-MEI have been learned through animal studies, not human trials. "The effects of 4-MEI have never been studied in humans, because chemicals are not tested on people," Nachman says. "So although we don't know for absolute certain that 4-MEI poses a risk, we can't interpret that to mean that there is no risk." What researchers do have, Nachman explains, is an animal study published by the National Toxicology Program in 2007 that found that 4-MEI caused lung tumors in mice. "California looked at the NTP's evidence and decided to regulate 4-MEI because of it," he says. "In my eyes, it makes the most sense for the federal government to cap 4-MEI limits so consumers are not required to assess risk."

How to Avoid Arsenic in Wine and Beer - MensJournal.com

How to Avoid Arsenic in Wine and Beer - MensJournal.com

So what can you do to avoid adding to your arsenic load?

Since tap water remains the most significant source, install a filter, especially if you have well water. "We know from studies that filtering contaminated water does, in fact, work," says Suk. Also mind your diet. "Eat a diverse, healthy diet that does not rely strongly on any one type of food, especially foods known to be high in arsenic," Cottingham says. "I try to limit my consumption of high-arsenic foods to once or twice a week."

Why there's arsenic in wine and beer

It was big news when 'Consumer Reports' and later the FDA announced there were possibly dangerous levels of arsenic in rice and other common foods. According to a recent Dartmouth University study, we may be exposed to arsenic in wine and beer as well.
The study found that people who drank two and half beers or one glass of white wine a day had up to 30 percent more arsenic in their bodies than nondrinkers. This toxic metal builds up in the body and has been linked to several kinds of cancer, cardiovascular problems, and impaired lung function. Although contaminated tap water is the biggest source of dietary arsenic exposure, experts are growing increasingly concerned about how much of this toxin we get from food and other beverages.
It's not entirely clear why these particular beverages were tied to high arsenic levels, but the researchers have a few hunches. "These products themselves may be heavy in arsenic, due to either arsenic in the ingredients or the diatomaceous earth used in their filtering processes," says study author Kathryn Cottingham. "These drinks may also interfere with the processes that remove arsenic from the body."
Besides beer and white wine, the study also linked dark-meat fish such as salmon, swordfish, and tuna – which are also known to carry mercury – to higher arsenic concentrations in toenails. Brussels sprouts ranked high, too, likely because they contain lots of sulfur, says Cottingham. "Arsenic binds to sulfur-containing compounds in plants," she explains.
Although we're exposed to a host of toxic chemicals every day, arsenic is particularly scary. "Arsenic is a well-known carcinogen and has effects on the cardiovascular system and lung function, but because there is no known mechanism, it's hard to determine how low a dose can be tolerated," says Bill Suk, chief of hazardous substances research at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. "We don't know how low a dose is okay, if any level is okay. And since it's a metalloid, arsenic has unique capabilities to bind with other chemicals, creating complex exposures that we know very little about."


– Melaina Juntti

Read more: http://www.mensjournal.com/health-fitness/nutrition/how-to-avoid-arsenic-in-wine-and-beer-20131224#ixzz3UrIjq6vi
Follow us: @mensjournal on Twitter | MensJournal on Facebook

California Winemakers Sued Over High Levels of Arsenic in Wines - Eater

California Winemakers Sued Over High Levels of Arsenic in Wines - Eater


Some studies say that a glass of wine is good for your health, but according to a new lawsuit, it just may kill you. CBS reports that a class action lawsuit was filed today in California against some of the country's top winemakers over the high levels of arsenic in wine. The lawsuit claims that some of the most popular wines have "up to four and five times the maximum amount of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows for drinking water."
Many are upset that there are basically no federal requirements to tell customers what's really in wine. In fact, the wine lobby has been fighting government action to require alcohol companies to label what's in their wine. Biz Journal notes that a Denver laboratory called BeverageGrades started running tests last fall to uncover the calorie counts in bottles of wine. Kevin Hicks — who owns the company — says that he ran tests on 1,300 bottles and was shocked at what results showed. Nearly a quarter of the bottles had levels of arsenic higher than the EPA's maximum for drinking water. When scanning through the results, Hicks noticed a pattern: The lower the price of the wine, the higher the levels of arsenic were. Trader Joe's famous Two-Buck Chuck White Zinfandel had three times the EPA's limit, while Franzia Blush had five times the limit.
“Arsenic is linked to many forms of cancer.”
Hicks says that when he tried to bring this information to the winemakers, they basically "hung up the phone." So, he filed a lawsuit accusing more than 24 California winemakers and sellers "of misrepresenting their wine as safe." Trader Joe's tells CBS that "they're investigating the matter" with many of their wine suppliers. A spokesperson for the Wine Group — another company named in the lawsuit — adds that the largest level of arsenic cited in the lawsuit is "only half of Canada's standard for wine, of 100 parts per billion."
Epidemiologist Allan Smith tells CBS news that arsenic can be fatal over time: "Arsenic is highly toxic," even at a parts per billion level. Smith adds, "[Arsenic] has many effects inside the body as cigarette smoking does" and that it is linked to many forms of cancer.
These new findings could have a negative impact on America's burgeoning wine industry: Last year, America officially dethroned France as the "number-one largest market for wine in the world." The news affects wine drinkers in other countries too. A report released in February shows that the U.S. is one of the largest exporters of wine in the world: In 2015, America exported just under $1.5 billion worth of wine.

White Wine and Beer Are Sources of Arsenic (LiveScience) | Dartmouth Now

White Wine and Beer Are Sources of Arsenic (LiveScience) | Dartmouth Now

A Dartmouth study indicates that white wine, beer, and Brussels sprouts can be “major sources of the toxic metal arsenic,” according to the news website LiveScience.
Researchers studied the diets of 852 New Hampshire residents and analyzed the levels of arsenic in their toenails, LiveScience reports. The study took into account amounts of arsenic in the subjects’ drinking water, which is considered the most significant source of arsenic in most people’s diets, according to LiveScience.
“Of the 120 foods the researchers looked at, four turned out to significantly raise people’s arsenic levels: beer, white wine (and to a lesser extent, red wine), Brussels sprouts, and dark-meat fish such as salmon, tuna and sardines, according to the study, published … in the Nutrition Journal,” writes LiveScience.
Study author Kathryn Cottingham, a professor of biological sciences and a professor in the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Graduate Program, tells LiveScience that it is not clear what level of concentration found in toenail samples would indicate an unsafe level of arsenic.

Read the full story, published 11/25/13 by LiveScience.

Lawsuit claims high levels of arsenic found in some California-made wines - CBS News

Lawsuit claims high levels of arsenic found in some California-made wines - CBS News

Following recent warnings about the amount of arsenic in apple juice and rice, a proposed class action lawsuit is being filed Thursday in California that claims some of the country's top selling wines have high levels of the element: up to four and five times the maximum amount the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) allows for drinking water, reports CBS News correspondent Carter Evans.

There are almost no federal labeling requirements to tell you what's really in wine, that's why a Denver laboratory started running tests to find out.

After 15 years working in the wine distribution business, Kevin Hicks started BeverageGrades, a laboratory that analyzes wine. What he discovered shocked him.

"Some very, very high levels of arsenic," Hicks said.

He tested more than 1,300 bottles of wine. Almost a quarter of them had levels higher than the EPA's maximum allowable amount of arsenic in drinking water: 10 parts per billion. No one can say for sure why, but Hicks noticed a pattern.

"The lower the price of wine on a per-liter basis, the higher the amount of arsenic," he said.

They included Trader Joe's famed Two-Buck Chuck White Zinfandel, which came in at three times the limit, a bottle of Ménage à Trois Moscato was four times the limit and a Franzia Blush had five times the EPA limit for drinking water.

He took the test results to some of those wine companies.

"Most wine companies, when I mention arsenic and wine in the same sentence, literally almost hung up the phone on me," he said.

The next step, he said, was to supply the data to a law firm.

"He was trying to get their attention; he was trying to blow the whistle on them," attorney Brian Kabateck said.

Thursday, he plans to file a class action lawsuit in California accusing more than 24 California winemakers and sellers of misrepresenting their wine as safe.

"We've done testing with two separate labs," Kabateck said.

He said they've checked Hicks' results and they "absolutely" stand up.

CBS News took those results to epidemiologist Allan Smith, associate director of the Arsenic Health Effects research program at U.C. Berkeley.

"These are about two to three times in this particular sample, the drinking water standard, and they vary, they fluctuated, but some of them were up to three, four or five times the drinking water standard," Smith said.

Smith said 50 parts per billion of arsenic -- the highest level found in one of the bottles Hicks tested -- can be deadly over time.

Even though "parts per billion" seems like a very small amount, Smith said "Arsenic is highly toxic; it's astonishing."

"It has as many effects inside the body as cigarette smoking does," Smith said.

But he based that on studies of drinking water, which is the only beverage with an arsenic limit set by the U.S. government.

"We estimate that approximately 1 in 100 people who drink water like that throughout their life will die from the arsenic, ultimately, due to mostly cancers from it," Smith said.

The federal government doesn't regulate wine like it does water, and a spokesperson for The Wine Group, one of the companies named in the lawsuit, told CBS News, "It would not be accurate or responsible to use the water standard as the baseline" because people generally drink more water than wine. He also pointed out that the highest level of arsenic cited in the lawsuit is "only half of Canada's standard for wine, of 100 parts per billion."

The FDA said it only handles contaminates in food and beverages on a "case-by-case basis."

"The industry, we believe, is not properly regulated, but the state of California has recognized the 10 parts per billion is a dangerous amount," Kabateck said.

He's interpreting a California law that requires businesses to warn consumers if their products contain "a chemical known to the state to cause cancer." California's threshold for arsenic is 10 parts per billion, the same as the EPA's water standard, but The Wine Institute, an advocacy group for California winemakers, said the industry already provides warning signs to be posted in retail stores.

The California attorney general's office confirmed that's all the law requires, but some think that's not enough.

"I think that all beverages should aim to meet the drinking water standard of 10 parts per billion," Smith said.

Two other defendants named in the lawsuit responded to CBS News' request for comment. Treasury Wine estates said its "brands are fully compliant with all relevant federal and state guidelines," and Trader Joe's, which sells Two Buck Chuck, said "the concerns raised in your inquiry are serious and are being treated as such. We are investigating the matter with several of our wine producing suppliers."

Kabateck said his ultimate goal is "to get the winemakers to recall these wines, to get them to refund the money that people paid for these wines, and ultimately to clean up the wine industry in California."

Smith said wine makers need to determine where the arsenic is coming from, but in the meantime, "it ought to have on the wine, 'this wine contains arsenic.'"

"To most consumers, that may or may not help them, but it would sure be a big incentive for the wine producer to get down to the drinking water standard," he said.

CBS News also spot-checked and tested the four wines listed in the lawsuit. They were not the same vintages, but the arsenic levels were all considerably lower than BeverageGrades' results. One of them, the Wine Group's Flip Flop Pinot Grigio, came in within the acceptable federal arsenic levels for water.

The others were at or above that limit, including Trader Joe's Two Buck Chuck White Zinfandel, which tested at more than twice that standard.